में अनुक्रमित
  • वैश्विक प्रभाव कारक (जीआईएफ)
  • उद्धरण कारक
  • इलेक्ट्रॉनिक जर्नल्स लाइब्रेरी
  • RefSeek
  • हमदर्द विश्वविद्यालय
  • ईबीएससीओ एज़
  • जीव विज्ञान की वर्चुअल लाइब्रेरी (विफैबियो)
  • मेडिकल जर्नल संपादकों की अंतर्राष्ट्रीय समिति (आईसीएमजेई)
  • गूगल ज्ञानी
इस पृष्ठ को साझा करें
जर्नल फ़्लायर
Flyer image

अमूर्त

In vitro Evaluation of the Root Surface Microtopography Following the Use of Two Polishing Systems by Confocal Microscopy (CFM) and Scanning Electron Microscope (SEM)

Objectives: To compare and evaluate the root surface roughness after using two polishing instruments for root planing.
Materials and Methods: This comparative study was carried out on a sample of ten extracted human teeth with twenty interproximal root surfaces.
Control group 1 and 2: (n=20 root surface): Gracey Curettes, 15 vertical strokes.
Test group 1 (n=10): control group 1 + Termination Diamond Curettes (TDC), 15 strokes.
Test group 2 (n=10): control group 2 + Termination Diamond Burs -15 μm (TDB), with irrigation for 15 seconds at 3000 rpm.
The root surface was planed with the polishing instruments and test measurements were obtained with Confocal Microscopy (CFM) and Scanning Electron Microscope (SEM).
The primary outcome variable was surface roughness (Ra).
Results: CFM showed that the TDC, mean changes in surface roughness (Ra) were reduced by 0.11 ± 0.14 (p-value=0.000), and the TDB, Ra: were reduced by 0.27 ± 0.86 (p-value=0.037). Non-statistically significant differences were observed in Ra (p-value=0.581) between the two polishing instruments. SEM showed that the Group 2 showed a generally rougher surface with more parallel grooves than Group1.
Conclusion: There are no statistically significant differences between these two polishing systems, although TDB seems to reduce the surface roughness more than the TDC after being treated with Gracey Curettes.

अस्वीकृति: इस सारांश का अनुवाद कृत्रिम बुद्धिमत्ता उपकरणों का उपयोग करके किया गया है और इसे अभी तक समीक्षा या सत्यापित नहीं किया गया है।