में अनुक्रमित
  • अकादमिक जर्नल डेटाबेस
  • जे गेट खोलो
  • जेनेमिक्स जर्नलसीक
  • शैक्षणिक कुंजी
  • जर्नल टीओसी
  • चीन राष्ट्रीय ज्ञान अवसंरचना (सीएनकेआई)
  • उद्धरण कारक
  • Scimago
  • उलरिच की आवधिक निर्देशिका
  • इलेक्ट्रॉनिक जर्नल्स लाइब्रेरी
  • RefSeek
  • हमदर्द विश्वविद्यालय
  • ईबीएससीओ एज़
  • ओसीएलसी- वर्ल्डकैट
  • एसडब्ल्यूबी ऑनलाइन कैटलॉग
  • जीव विज्ञान की वर्चुअल लाइब्रेरी (विफैबियो)
  • पबलोन्स
  • मियार
  • विश्वविद्यालय अनुदान आयोग
  • चिकित्सा शिक्षा और अनुसंधान के लिए जिनेवा फाउंडेशन
  • यूरो पब
  • गूगल ज्ञानी
इस पृष्ठ को साझा करें
जर्नल फ़्लायर
Flyer image

अमूर्त

Study to Determine Bioequivalence of Three Ceftiofur Crystalline Free Acid in Pigs

Luis Ocampo-Camberos, Minerva Monroy-Barreto, Agustín Nieto-Carmona, Juan Angel Jaime, Lilia Gutierrez

Background: Antimicrobial resistance has the potential to affect sustainable development goals in food-producing livestock. Poor quality antibacterial pharmaceutical preparations significantly contribute to heighten this problem. Bioequivalence (BE) studies are very important for the development of dependable pharmaceutical preparations.

Methods: In this trial 3 Ceftiofur Crystalline Free Acid (CCFA) pharmaceutical preparations (1 reference and 2 experimental), intended for swine medicine and freely sold in Mexico, were tested to assess as to whether or not they can be regarded as generic ones.

Results: Three commercially available products of CCFA containing 200 mg of ceftiofur crystalline free acid were compared taking Excede® brand as reference preparation and preparations A and B as experimental ones. Thirty-six Landrace/Duroc pigs randomly divided into three groups received a single injection in phase 1 and after a washout period the same procedure was repeated in a crossover phase. Based on PK data obtained through HPLC analytical recollection of serum concentrations of ceftiofur, it is possible to conclude that preparations A and B cannot be regarded as bioequivalent to Excede® in pigs given that AUC0-168, MRT and K½el values obtained from preparations A and B are statistically different beyond a 20% limit from the corresponding ones obtained for the reference preparation, with confidence intervals >0.05.

Conclusion: Based on the area under the concentration vs time curve from zero to 168 h, mean residence time, and elimination constant values obtained from preparations A and B it is possible to conclude that they cannot be regarded as bioequivalent to Excede® in pigs (CI>0.05).